Dobranski Credibility Bottoms
Wed, Aug15, 2007 - Category: School of
Law
That is the opinion of many individuals in the Ave
Maria School of Law community.
Dean Bernard Dobranski shirks his fiduciary duty to attend AMSL Alumni Association Board meetings and answer the questions of these elected stakeholders; yet, he spends 2 hours on the phone doing an interview with the blog "Above the Law: A Legal Tabloid". PART 1 | PART 2
In Part 2 of that interview, in response to the question of whether AMSL's governance is overly influenced by Tom Monaghan's financial support, Dobranski said "If you want to get call it meddling, you can call it meddling, but I think it's proper for the Chairman of our Board, who has been our chief financial benefactor, saying I think our law school would thrive and do better down there [in Naples]."
Meddling? How about "gross conflict of interest"? Dobranski cannot be serious when he talks of Chairman Monaghan's "I think our law school would thrive and do better" as if it were merely a "suggestion" to the Board. Tom Monaghan is not only AMSL Board Chairman and primary donor, but also a speculative Florida real estate developer. The facts are that:
In the same interview Dobranski said "I'm not ashamed of getting as much money as I can, including from Tom's foundation, to help defray the financial burdens for our students". I bet. But why stop at scholarships. With that thinking, the Dean should get as much money as he can from Tom for faculty salaries, and books, and nice cherry paneling. Those are all "good" too, just like scholarships. But a simply understanding of utilitarianism would show that the goodness of the end does not determine the goodness (or sensibility) of the means. If the Dean has neither the will, the discipline, nor the plain sight to recognize the undue influence that financial dependency on one donor brings to a non-profit academic enterprise, he should step down for putting Monaghan above mission.
The good people at Holy Spirit Catholic Church had the foresight to see that Tom Monaghan "gives" to "get" control; they also had the discipline to reject such a "gift". Dobranski is the only law school dean in the country who is bound to report regularly to one donor, at the donor's office. That bind might bring tuition down via scholarships, but it also brings down autonomy and institutional integrity. It is interesting how those who sell their autonomy to Tom Monaghan demand that everyone else in the organization do the same.
AveWatch issues a public invitation to the Dean: Write a brief piece for AW in which you formally recognize...
It would be even better if Dobranski first explained this to his faculty, students, and alumni instead of AveWatch.
Dean Bernard Dobranski shirks his fiduciary duty to attend AMSL Alumni Association Board meetings and answer the questions of these elected stakeholders; yet, he spends 2 hours on the phone doing an interview with the blog "Above the Law: A Legal Tabloid". PART 1 | PART 2
In Part 2 of that interview, in response to the question of whether AMSL's governance is overly influenced by Tom Monaghan's financial support, Dobranski said "If you want to get call it meddling, you can call it meddling, but I think it's proper for the Chairman of our Board, who has been our chief financial benefactor, saying I think our law school would thrive and do better down there [in Naples]."
Meddling? How about "gross conflict of interest"? Dobranski cannot be serious when he talks of Chairman Monaghan's "I think our law school would thrive and do better" as if it were merely a "suggestion" to the Board. Tom Monaghan is not only AMSL Board Chairman and primary donor, but also a speculative Florida real estate developer. The facts are that:
- Monaghan has personal land holdings, for-profit businesses (including the local utility company), and a bank as part of Ave Maria Town's development
- Monaghan had an ultimatum that AMSL move to his Florida development or have the school's money yanked
In the same interview Dobranski said "I'm not ashamed of getting as much money as I can, including from Tom's foundation, to help defray the financial burdens for our students". I bet. But why stop at scholarships. With that thinking, the Dean should get as much money as he can from Tom for faculty salaries, and books, and nice cherry paneling. Those are all "good" too, just like scholarships. But a simply understanding of utilitarianism would show that the goodness of the end does not determine the goodness (or sensibility) of the means. If the Dean has neither the will, the discipline, nor the plain sight to recognize the undue influence that financial dependency on one donor brings to a non-profit academic enterprise, he should step down for putting Monaghan above mission.
The good people at Holy Spirit Catholic Church had the foresight to see that Tom Monaghan "gives" to "get" control; they also had the discipline to reject such a "gift". Dobranski is the only law school dean in the country who is bound to report regularly to one donor, at the donor's office. That bind might bring tuition down via scholarships, but it also brings down autonomy and institutional integrity. It is interesting how those who sell their autonomy to Tom Monaghan demand that everyone else in the organization do the same.
AveWatch issues a public invitation to the Dean: Write a brief piece for AW in which you formally recognize...
- that AMSL Board Chairman Monaghan's for-profit ventures, personal land holdings, and Florida non-profit investment (AMU) will directly benefit from AMSL's move to the Chairman's real estate development;
- that AMSL Board Chairman Monaghan intended to
pull his financial support from AMSL unless it
agreed to move to his real estate development;
It would be even better if Dobranski first explained this to his faculty, students, and alumni instead of AveWatch.